WFBIX vs. AGG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG).
WFBIX is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Jul 2, 1993. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WFBIX or AGG.
Correlation
The correlation between WFBIX and AGG is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WFBIX vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WFBIX:
0.91
AGG:
0.92
WFBIX:
1.32
AGG:
1.34
WFBIX:
1.16
AGG:
1.16
WFBIX:
0.35
AGG:
0.37
WFBIX:
2.26
AGG:
2.31
WFBIX:
2.12%
AGG:
2.09%
WFBIX:
5.27%
AGG:
5.24%
WFBIX:
-18.65%
AGG:
-18.43%
WFBIX:
-8.16%
AGG:
-7.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFBIX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than AGG's 1.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WFBIX having a 1.35% annualized return and AGG not far ahead at 1.40%.
WFBIX
0.99%
1.33%
-0.48%
4.07%
-0.52%
1.35%
AGG
1.16%
1.36%
-0.55%
4.11%
-0.49%
1.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WFBIX vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WFBIX and AGG have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WFBIX vs. AGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WFBIX
AGG
WFBIX vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WFBIX vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
WFBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than AGG's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFBIX iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | 3.66% | 3.66% | 3.15% | 2.60% | 2.06% | 2.45% | 2.88% | 2.71% | 2.25% | 2.19% | 2.21% | 1.76% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.74% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
WFBIX vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFBIX drawdown since its inception was -18.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFBIX and AGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WFBIX vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) is 1.28%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that WFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.