PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WES vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WES vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WES achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 18.85% return.


WES

1D
1.43%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
17.89%
6M
18.16%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
30.48%
5Y*
24.68%
10Y*
10.52%

FLJH

1D
0.82%
1M
1.43%
YTD
18.85%
6M
15.00%
1Y
45.89%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
20.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WES vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WES
Western Midstream Partners, LP
17.89%12.77%43.58%19.46%29.29%72.31%-19.13%-22.65%-20.23%-2.36%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
18.85%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WES and FLJH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between WES and FLJH has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WES vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WES
WES Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
WES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
WES Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
WES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WES Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WES vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WESFLJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

4.20

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

16.28

-10.12

WES vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WES Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WES and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WES vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WES drawdown since its inception was -93.66%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WES and FLJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WESFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.66%

-31.51%

-62.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-10.80%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.65%

-20.39%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-20.39%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-1.30%

-4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.49%

-5.30%

-23.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

2.78%

+1.45%

Volatility

WES vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 5.20%. This indicates that WES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WESFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

5.20%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.58%

14.09%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.24%

18.44%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.20%

18.61%

+10.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.62%

19.84%

+26.78%

Dividends

WES vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

WES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than FLJH's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.28%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%0.00%
WES
Western Midstream Partners, LP
8.21%9.13%8.33%8.52%6.80%5.69%11.25%12.45%8.28%5.43%4.03%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


WES and FLJH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WES has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to FLJH (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WES dropped -93.66% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WES and FLJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer