WELP.L vs. RMAP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WELP.L (HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF) and RMAP.L (HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - WELP.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while RMAP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WELP.L returned -5.85%/yr vs 19.94%/yr for RMAP.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WELP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RMAP.L.

Performance

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELP.L achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly lower than RMAP.L's 3.85% return.

WELP.L

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: -3.88%
• 6M: -7.49%
• 1Y: 14.52%
• 3Y*: -2.38%
• 5Y*: -5.85%
• 10Y*: —

RMAP.L

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 33.56%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 19.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WELP.L HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF	-3.88%	11.73%	-8.79%	-2.41%	-22.31%	-4.58%	14.58%
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC	3.85%	53.50%	28.00%	7.09%	11.74%	-2.81%	10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between WELP.L and RMAP.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020	0.05

Return for Risk

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELP.L

WELP.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
WELP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
WELP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
WELP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
WELP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WELP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

RMAP.L

RMAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
RMAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
RMAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
RMAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RMAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
RMAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) and HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WELP.L	RMAP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	0.70	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	1.27	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	1.22	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	2.43	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the RMAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELP.L and RMAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WELP.L	RMAP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	0.70	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.81	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.71	-0.83

Drawdowns

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELP.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than RMAP.L's maximum drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELP.L and RMAP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELP.L	RMAP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.41%	-27.31%	-21.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.47%	-27.31%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.53%	-27.31%	-11.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.41%	-27.31%	-21.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.94%	-18.98%	-15.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.47%	-7.28%	-18.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.22%	13.76%	+6.46%

Volatility

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Volatility Comparison

HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) at 5.08%. This indicates that WELP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WELP.L	RMAP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.53%	5.08%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.27%	19.92%	-5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.88%	47.58%	-1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.58%	24.84%	+13.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.38%	23.73%	+11.65%

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAP.L's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

WELP.L vs. RMAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WELP.L nor RMAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELP.L and RMAP.L in my portfolio?

WELP.L and RMAP.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WELP.L or RMAP.L?

On fees, RMAP.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WELP.L or RMAP.L?

RMAP.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for WELP.L.

What is the main difference between WELP.L and RMAP.L?

WELP.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while RMAP.L is Precious Metals. WELP.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while RMAP.L tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for WELP.L and 0.22% for RMAP.L.