RMAP.L vs. VGOV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) and Vanguard UK Gilt UCITS ETF Distributing (VGOV.L).
RMAP.L and VGOV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RMAP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Feb 12, 2020. VGOV.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both RMAP.L and VGOV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RMAP.L or VGOV.L.
Key characteristics
| RMAP.L | VGOV.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.52% | 184.06% |
| 1Y Return | 15.00% | 1,995.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.54% | 704.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.32 | 16.87 |
| Daily Std Dev | 47.31% | 118.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.53% | -50.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.67% | -0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMAP.L and VGOV.L is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RMAP.L vs. VGOV.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RMAP.L achieves a 14.52% return, which is significantly lower than VGOV.L's 184.06% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMAP.L vs. VGOV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMAP.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VGOV.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RMAP.L vs. VGOV.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) and Vanguard UK Gilt UCITS ETF Distributing (VGOV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RMAP.L vs. VGOV.L - Dividend Comparison
RMAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGOV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 123.65%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGOV.L Vanguard UK Gilt UCITS ETF Distributing | 123.65% | 30.62% | 1.87% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.62% | 162.39% | 192.39% | 205.24% | 190.47% |
Drawdowns
RMAP.L vs. VGOV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMAP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum VGOV.L drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAP.L and VGOV.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RMAP.L vs. VGOV.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Vanguard UK Gilt UCITS ETF Distributing (VGOV.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that RMAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGOV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.