PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WELP.L is traded in GBp, while IUHC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUHC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELP.L achieves a -7.08% return, which is significantly lower than IUHC.L's -4.58% return.


WELP.L

1D
1.05%
1M
0.02%
YTD
-7.08%
6M
-10.58%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
-3.24%
5Y*
-6.49%
10Y*

IUHC.L

1D
1.03%
1M
2.41%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-4.94%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WELP.L
HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF
-7.08%11.73%-8.79%-2.41%-22.31%-4.58%22.80%-15.80%
IUHC.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-4.58%6.50%3.95%-3.36%8.95%28.79%8.64%11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between WELP.L and IUHC.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2019

0.60

The correlation between WELP.L and IUHC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (5 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WELP.L
IUHC.L

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

WELP.L
100.0%
IUHC.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Communication Services

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Consumer Defensive

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Energy

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Financial Services

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Industrials

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Real Estate

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Technology

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Utilities

WELP.L

-

IUHC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELP.L
WELP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WELP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WELP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IUHC.L
IUHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WELP.LIUHC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

1.14

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.58

2.89

-2.30

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the IUHC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELP.L and IUHC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WELP.LIUHC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

0.88

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.41

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.59

-0.72

Drawdowns

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELP.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than IUHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELP.L and IUHC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELP.LIUHC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.41%

-19.73%

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.47%

-11.67%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.53%

-19.73%

-18.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.41%

-19.73%

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.11%

-7.81%

-29.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.46%

-4.71%

-20.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.15%

4.63%

+15.52%

Volatility

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Volatility Comparison

HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) at 4.88%. This indicates that WELP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELP.LIUHC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

4.88%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.86%

10.99%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.81%

15.24%

+30.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.55%

15.11%

+23.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.37%

16.57%

+18.80%

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WELP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IUHC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WELP.L nor IUHC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WELP.L and IUHC.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for WELP.L.

WELP.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for WELP.L and 0.15% for IUHC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELP.L and IUHC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer