WELP.L vs. IUHC.L
WELP.L (HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF) and IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - WELP.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while IUHC.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WELP.L returned -6.49%/yr vs 6.26%/yr for IUHC.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WELP.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUHC.L.
Performance
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WELP.L is traded in GBp, while IUHC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUHC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELP.L achieves a -7.08% return, which is significantly lower than IUHC.L's -4.58% return.
WELP.L
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- -7.08%
- 6M
- -10.58%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- -3.24%
- 5Y*
- -6.49%
- 10Y*
- —
IUHC.L
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELP.L HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF | -7.08% | 11.73% | -8.79% | -2.41% | -22.31% | -4.58% | 22.80% | -15.80% |
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.58% | 6.50% | 3.95% | -3.36% | 8.95% | 28.79% | 8.64% | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELP.L and IUHC.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between WELP.L and IUHC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (5 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WELP.L
IUHC.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
WELP.L
IUHC.L
Basic Materials
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Communication Services
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Energy
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Financial Services
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Industrials
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Real Estate
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Technology
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Utilities
WELP.L
-
IUHC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L — Risk / Return Rank
WELP.L
IUHC.L
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELP.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 1.14 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 2.89 | -2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELP.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.88 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.41 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.59 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELP.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than IUHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELP.L and IUHC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELP.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.41% | -19.73% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.47% | -11.67% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.53% | -19.73% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.41% | -19.73% | -28.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.11% | -7.81% | -29.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -4.71% | -20.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.15% | 4.63% | +15.52% |
Volatility
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) at 4.88%. This indicates that WELP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELP.L | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 4.88% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.86% | 10.99% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.81% | 15.24% | +30.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.55% | 15.11% | +23.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.37% | 16.57% | +18.80% |
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IUHC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WELP.L vs. IUHC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WELP.L nor IUHC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WELP.L and IUHC.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for WELP.L.
WELP.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for WELP.L and 0.15% for IUHC.L.
Find the right allocation for WELP.L and IUHC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer