RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L).
RMAP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Feb 12, 2020.
Performance
RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 9.42% | 53.50% | 28.00% | 7.09% | 11.74% | -2.81% | 10.34% |
LLOY.L Lloyds Banking Group plc | -6.01% | 88.33% | 21.09% | 10.91% | -0.38% | 34.81% | -29.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMAP.L achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly higher than LLOY.L's -6.01% return.
RMAP.L
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -9.72%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 22.78%
- 1Y
- 44.95%
- 3Y*
- 29.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.75%
- 10Y*
- —
LLOY.L
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 34.53%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L — Risk / Return Rank
RMAP.L
LLOY.L
RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMAP.L | LLOY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.84 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.71 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 5.80 | -2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMAP.L | LLOY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.83 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.17 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMAP.L and LLOY.L is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L - Dividend Comparison
RMAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLOY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMAP.L HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLOY.L Lloyds Banking Group plc | 3.61% | 3.39% | 5.29% | 5.28% | 4.69% | 2.59% | 6.17% | 5.22% | 6.02% | 4.70% | 4.56% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMAP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum LLOY.L drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAP.L and LLOY.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMAP.L | LLOY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -90.48% | +63.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -19.68% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -25.65% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.64% | -25.45% | +10.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -41.52% | +34.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.11% | 5.79% | +6.32% |
Volatility
RMAP.L vs. LLOY.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf The Royal Mint Responsibly Sourced Physical Gold ETC (RMAP.L) has a higher volatility of 11.49% compared to Lloyds Banking Group plc (LLOY.L) at 9.69%. This indicates that RMAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLOY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMAP.L | LLOY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.49% | 9.69% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.02% | 18.35% | +28.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.07% | 27.12% | +20.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 26.71% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 30.57% | -6.68% |