WELL vs. NANC

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

WELL (Welltower Inc.) is a stock, while NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Subversive. Over the past 3 years, WELL returned 41.22%/yr vs 22.64%/yr for NANC. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WELL vs. NANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Welltower Inc. (WELL) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELL achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than NANC's 10.22% return.

WELL

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 15.46%
• 6M: 12.51%
• 1Y: 41.79%
• 3Y*: 41.22%
• 5Y*: 24.40%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

NANC

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 3.76%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 6M: 10.78%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELL vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WELL Welltower Inc.	15.46%	49.86%	43.07%	24.72%
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	10.22%	18.54%	26.83%	22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between WELL and NANC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023	0.18

The correlation between WELL and NANC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WELL vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELL

WELL Risk / Return Rank: 86
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 85

NANC

NANC Risk / Return Rank: 57
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELL vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Welltower Inc. (WELL) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WELL	NANC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.84	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.53	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.33	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.16	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.19	8.74	-0.56

WELL vs. NANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELL Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the NANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELL and NANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WELL vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELL drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL and NANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELL	NANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.33%	-20.94%	-42.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.61%	-12.21%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.99%	-20.94%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-0.68%	-2.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.31%	-2.67%	-7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	3.00%	+2.12%

Volatility

WELL vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison

Welltower Inc. (WELL) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) at 5.79%. This indicates that WELL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WELL	NANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.50%	5.79%	+3.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.83%	11.46%	+5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.68%	14.35%	+7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.82%	16.87%	+6.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	16.87%	+15.04%

Dividends

WELL vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison

WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than NANC's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.20%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WELL Welltower Inc.	1.39%	1.52%	2.03%	2.71%	3.72%	2.84%	4.18%	4.26%	5.01%	5.46%	5.14%	4.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELL and NANC in my portfolio?

WELL and NANC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WELL or NANC?

WELL has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to NANC (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WELL dropped -63.33% vs NANC's -20.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.