PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELL vs. ANAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WELL vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Welltower Inc. (WELL) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELL achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly lower than ANAB's 77.94% return.


WELL

1D
0.05%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
12.11%
6M
11.87%
1Y
38.74%
3Y*
39.84%
5Y*
24.38%
10Y*
15.02%

ANAB

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
77.94%
6M
75.76%
1Y
272.31%
3Y*
66.32%
5Y*
28.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELL vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WELL
Welltower Inc.
12.11%49.86%43.07%41.79%-21.18%36.98%-17.19%23.04%15.31%1.08%
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
77.94%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-74.53%-36.67%529.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WELL and ANAB is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2017

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WELL:

$150.08B

ANAB:

$1.65B

EPS

WELL:

$2.02

ANAB:

-$0.91

PS Ratio

WELL:

12.39

ANAB:

7.29

PB Ratio

WELL:

3.43

ANAB:

129.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

WELL:

$11.63B

ANAB:

$232.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WELL:

$3.25B

ANAB:

$245.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

WELL:

$3.00B

ANAB:

$52.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELL vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELL
WELL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELL vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Welltower Inc. (WELL) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WELLANABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

9.62

-6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

22.85

-15.65

WELL vs. ANAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELL Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the ANAB Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELL and ANAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WELL vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELL drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, smaller than the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL and ANAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELLANABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.33%

-92.08%

+28.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-28.15%

+15.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-69.32%

+56.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-69.32%

+28.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-32.89%

+26.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-64.58%

+54.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

11.83%

-6.68%

Volatility

WELL vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Welltower Inc. (WELL) is 9.50%, while AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) has a volatility of 12.25%. This indicates that WELL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELLANABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

12.25%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

46.71%

-29.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

69.09%

-47.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

65.38%

-41.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.91%

75.41%

-43.50%

Dividends

WELL vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison

WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, while ANAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
1.43%1.52%2.03%2.71%3.72%2.84%4.18%4.26%5.01%5.46%5.14%4.85%

Financials

WELL vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Welltower Inc. and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.35B
25.56M
(WELL) Total Revenue
(ANAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WELL and ANAB have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANAB has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to WELL (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WELL dropped -63.33% vs ANAB's -92.08%.

ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELL and ANAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer