WEEL vs. XYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WEEL (Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. WEEL is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, WEEL returned 20.16% vs 17.66% for XYLD. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WEEL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.

Performance

WEEL vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WEEL having a 5.22% return and XYLD slightly lower at 4.96%.

WEEL

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 5.22%
• 6M: 5.75%
• 1Y: 20.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XYLD

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 4.96%
• 6M: 6.48%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 11.27%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 8.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEEL vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	5.22%	17.73%	3.33%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	4.96%	8.02%	12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between WEEL and XYLD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024	0.68

The correlation between WEEL and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

WEEL vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WEEL	XYLD
Consumer Cyclical	20.3%	10.2%
Healthcare	16.8%	8.5%
Basic Materials	16.7%	1.8%
Technology	15.5%	35.6%
Communication Services	13.8%	11.2%
Energy	5.6%	3.5%
Financial Services	4.0%	11.8%
Industrials	3.7%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.9%
Utilities	0.2%	2.3%

Return for Risk

WEEL vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEEL

WEEL Risk / Return Rank: 84
WEEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
WEEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
WEEL Omega Ratio Rank: 85
WEEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
WEEL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 82
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEEL vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WEEL	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.71	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	3.87	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.64	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	3.35	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.37	17.84	+3.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WEEL vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEL Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEL and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WEEL	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.71	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.60	+0.40

Drawdowns

WEEL vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEL drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEL and XYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEEL	XYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.45%	-33.46%	+16.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-5.29%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.15%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-3.72%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.99%	-0.04%

Volatility

WEEL vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that WEEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEEL	XYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.85%	0.88%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.83%	5.37%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.01%	6.55%	+1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.84%	11.22%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.84%	14.21%	-1.37%

WEEL vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEEL vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

WEEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.46%, more than XYLD's 10.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	12.46%	12.72%	6.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.52%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEEL and XYLD in my portfolio?

WEEL and XYLD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEEL or XYLD?

WEEL has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEL dropped -17.45% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

Which ETF is better, WEEL or XYLD?

On 1-year performance, WEEL leads with 20.16% vs 17.66% for XYLD. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEEL or XYLD?

Over the 1-year period, WEEL has performed better with a 20.16% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEEL or XYLD?

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WEEL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEEL or XYLD?

WEEL has the higher dividend yield at 12.46%, compared with 10.52% for XYLD.

What is the main difference between WEEL and XYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Peerless ETFs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WEEL and 0.60% for XYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.