WEEI vs. MLPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WEEI (Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF) and MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - WEEI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Westwood, while MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%). WEEI is actively managed, while MLPR is passively managed. Over the past year, WEEI returned 34.24% vs 32.42% for MLPR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WEEI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MLPR.

Performance

WEEI vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF (WEEI) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEI achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 29.81% return.

WEEI

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 18.31%
• 1Y: 34.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 29.81%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 32.14%
• 5Y*: 26.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEEI vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WEEI Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF	18.85%	11.28%	-3.07%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	29.81%	9.83%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between WEEI and MLPR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	0.62

The correlation between WEEI and MLPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WEEI vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEEI

WEEI Risk / Return Rank: 74
WEEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
WEEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
WEEI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
WEEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
WEEI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEEI vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF (WEEI) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WEEI	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	1.59	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.11	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.27	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.48	2.33	+2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.29	7.53	+6.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WEEI vs. MLPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the MLPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEI and MLPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WEEI	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	1.59	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.93	-0.24

Drawdowns

WEEI vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEI drawdown since its inception was -18.78%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEI and MLPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEEI	MLPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.78%	-48.98%	+30.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-13.97%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-7.07%	+4.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-8.94%	+4.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	4.32%	-1.91%

Volatility

WEEI vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF (WEEI) is 6.21%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that WEEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEEI	MLPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	8.12%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	14.85%	-4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	20.64%	-6.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.30%	29.52%	-11.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	33.75%	-15.45%

WEEI vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEEI vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

WEEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than MLPR's 9.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	9.00%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%
WEEI Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF	11.22%	12.59%	7.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEEI and MLPR in my portfolio?

WEEI and MLPR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEEI or MLPR?

MLPR has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to WEEI (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEI dropped -18.78% vs MLPR's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, WEEI or MLPR?

On 1-year performance, WEEI leads with 34.24% vs 32.42% for MLPR. On fees, WEEI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, WEEI has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEEI or MLPR?

Over the 1-year period, WEEI has performed better with a 34.24% return vs 32.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEEI or MLPR?

WEEI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEEI or MLPR?

WEEI has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 9.00% for MLPR.

What is the main difference between WEEI and MLPR?

WEEI is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Westwood and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WEEI and 0.95% for MLPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WEEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.