WEEI vs. FTWO
WEEI (Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF) and FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. WEEI is actively managed, while FTWO is passively managed. Over the past year, WEEI returned 34.24% vs 30.91% for FTWO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEEI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FTWO.
Performance
WEEI vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEEI achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 10.90% return.
WEEI
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 34.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTWO
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEEI vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WEEI Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF | 18.85% | 11.28% | -3.07% |
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 10.90% | 43.06% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEEI and FTWO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WEEI and FTWO has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WEEI vs. FTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEEI
FTWO
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
WEEI
FTWO
Basic Materials
WEEI
-
FTWO
Communication Services
WEEI
-
FTWO
-
Consumer Cyclical
WEEI
-
FTWO
-
Consumer Defensive
WEEI
-
FTWO
Financial Services
WEEI
-
FTWO
-
Healthcare
WEEI
-
FTWO
-
Industrials
WEEI
-
FTWO
Real Estate
WEEI
-
FTWO
-
Technology
WEEI
-
FTWO
-
Utilities
WEEI
-
FTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEEI vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank
WEEI
FTWO
WEEI vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF (WEEI) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEEI | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.29 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 2.69 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.29 | 7.23 | +7.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEEI | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 1.72 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.31 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
WEEI vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEEI drawdown since its inception was -18.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FTWO drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEI and FTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEEI | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -18.17% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -11.54% | +3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -9.19% | +6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -3.43% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 4.29% | -1.88% |
Volatility
WEEI vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison
Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF (WEEI) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) at 5.79%. This indicates that WEEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEEI | FTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 5.79% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.73% | 14.59% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 18.09% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 19.23% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 19.23% | -0.93% |
WEEI vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEEI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEEI vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison
WEEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than FTWO's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF | 1.01% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 0.59% |
WEEI Westwood Salient Enhanced Energy Income ETF | 11.22% | 12.59% | 7.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEEI and FTWO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEEI has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to FTWO (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEI dropped -18.78% vs FTWO's -18.17%.
On 1-year performance, WEEI leads with 34.24% vs 30.91% for FTWO. On fees, FTWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FTWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WEEI has performed better with a 34.24% return vs 30.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WEEI.
WEEI has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 1.01% for FTWO.
They also come from different issuers: Westwood and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WEEI and 0.49% for FTWO.
WEEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEEI and FTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer