PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEED vs. NVDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEED vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEED achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 17.79% return.


WEED

1D
-6.32%
1M
-8.24%
6M
0.22%
YTD
-8.58%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
-7.31%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-28.61%

NVDW

1D
4.17%
1M
14.58%
6M
28.72%
YTD
17.79%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.84M$1.69M$2.82M
$218.39K$220.76K$419.77K

WEED vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WEED
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
-8.58%90.50%
NVDW
Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
17.79%33.44%

Correlation

The correlation between WEED and NVDW is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEED vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WEED
WEED Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
WEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEED Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEED Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WEED vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEEDNVDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.11

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

0.86

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

1.74

-1.15

WEED vs. NVDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEED Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the NVDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEED and NVDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEED vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEED drawdown since its inception was -88.37%, which is greater than NVDW's maximum drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEED and NVDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEEDNVDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.37%

-25.54%

-62.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.01%

-25.54%

-28.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.47%

-9.25%

-67.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.98%

-9.39%

-54.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.27%

12.57%

+18.70%

Volatility

WEED vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) is 12.68%, while Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a volatility of 15.20%. This indicates that WEED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEEDNVDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

15.20%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.07%

33.75%

+22.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.94%

43.69%

+67.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.77%

42.45%

+39.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.77%

42.45%

+39.32%

WEED vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEED has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEED vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison

WEED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.73%.


PositionTTM2025
NVDW
Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
56.73%38.94%
WEED
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEED and NVDW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDW has higher volatility (15.20%) compared to WEED (12.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEED dropped -88.37% vs NVDW's -25.54%.

On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 21.83% vs 18.56% for WEED. On fees, WEED is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WEED has been the lower-risk option at 12.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 21.83% return vs 18.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEED is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 56.73%, compared with 0.00% for WEED.

WEED is categorized as Cannabis, while NVDW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WEED and 0.99% for NVDW.

NVDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEED and NVDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer