PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEED vs. CURLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEED vs. CURLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WEED vs. CURLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WEED
Roundhill Cannabis ETF
-23.72%19.40%-44.93%0.87%-60.22%
CURLF
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.
-15.08%61.54%-61.58%-5.52%-30.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEED achieves a -23.72% return, which is significantly lower than CURLF's -15.08% return.


WEED

1D
12.68%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
-23.72%
6M
-26.88%
1Y
37.27%
3Y*
-13.04%
5Y*
10Y*

CURLF

1D
13.23%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-15.08%
6M
-23.30%
1Y
135.16%
3Y*
-8.68%
5Y*
-32.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEED vs. CURLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEED
WEED Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEED Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEED Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CURLF
CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEED vs. CURLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEEDCURLFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

1.10

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

2.24

-0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.91

-1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.28

3.80

-2.52

WEED vs. CURLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEED Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the CURLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEED and CURLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEEDCURLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.10

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

-0.15

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between WEED and CURLF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WEED vs. CURLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEED nor CURLF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WEED vs. CURLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEED drawdown since its inception was -88.07%, smaller than the maximum CURLF drawdown of -95.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEED and CURLF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WEEDCURLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.07%

-95.70%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.01%

-59.79%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.88%

-87.49%

+7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.26%

-57.72%

-4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.38%

30.01%

-2.63%

Volatility

WEED vs. CURLF - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) have volatilities of 22.82% and 22.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WEEDCURLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.82%

22.79%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.66%

83.75%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.98%

124.40%

-14.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.88%

85.28%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.88%

83.15%

-1.27%