WEBS vs. KRMA
WEBS (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares) and KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEBS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while KRMA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WEBS returned -33.85%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for KRMA. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. WEBS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for KRMA.
Performance
WEBS vs. KRMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -11.73% return, which is significantly lower than KRMA's 11.07% return.
WEBS
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -16.73%
- YTD
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -16.44%
- 3Y*
- -44.25%
- 5Y*
- -33.85%
- 10Y*
- —
KRMA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 21.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
WEBS vs. KRMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | -11.73% | -40.66% | -56.62% | -75.58% | 117.15% | -39.82% | -87.18% | -10.90% |
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 11.07% | 13.98% | 18.12% | 22.08% | -18.96% | 27.71% | 17.53% | 4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBS and KRMA is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | -0.76 |
The correlation between WEBS and KRMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBS vs. KRMA — Risk / Return Rank
WEBS
KRMA
WEBS vs. KRMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBS | KRMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.47 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 9.05 | -9.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBS vs. KRMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than KRMA's maximum drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and KRMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBS | KRMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.63% | -36.16% | -63.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.54% | -8.62% | -44.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.33% | -19.41% | -70.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.09% | -26.12% | -70.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.57% | -1.67% | -97.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.18% | -4.90% | -86.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.10% | 2.35% | +21.75% |
Volatility
WEBS vs. KRMA - Volatility Comparison
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) at 2.84%. This indicates that WEBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBS | KRMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.31% | 2.84% | +15.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.79% | 10.00% | +37.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.11% | 12.66% | +47.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.26% | 17.23% | +65.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.49% | 18.46% | +71.03% |
WEBS vs. KRMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than KRMA's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBS vs. KRMA - Dividend Comparison
WEBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than KRMA's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 2.36% | 2.59% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% |
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | 3.10% | 3.77% | 8.02% | 8.51% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 1.11% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBS and KRMA have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBS has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to KRMA (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs KRMA's -36.16%.
On 5-year performance, KRMA leads with 10.26% vs -33.85% for WEBS. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KRMA has performed better with a 10.26% return vs -33.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WEBS.
WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.36% for KRMA.
WEBS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KRMA is Large Cap Growth Equities. WEBS tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WEBS and 0.43% for KRMA.
KRMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBS and KRMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer