WEBN.DE vs. FLCH
WEBN.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEBN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WEBN.DE returned 27.20% vs 2.14% for FLCH. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEBN.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WEBN.DE is traded in EUR, while FLCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBN.DE achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -6.87% return.
WEBN.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 14.22%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -7.75%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 12.37% | 9.70% | 7.87% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.87% | 16.82% | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBN.DE and FLCH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
WEBN.DE
FLCH
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBN.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.04 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 0.14 | +3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 0.29 | +16.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBN.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.22%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBN.DE and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBN.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -55.61% | +34.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -15.82% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -32.71% | +32.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -25.78% | +22.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 7.53% | -5.92% |
Volatility
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) is 3.05%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that WEBN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBN.DE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 5.30% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 12.98% | -4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.74% | 18.77% | -7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 28.32% | -13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 27.07% | -12.19% |
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBN.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WEBN.DE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
WEBN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.57% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
WEBN.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBN.DE and FLCH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
WEBN.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for WEBN.DE and 0.19% for FLCH.
Find the right allocation for WEBN.DE and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer