WEBL vs. TPYP
WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WEBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WEBL returned -23.34%/yr vs 17.96%/yr for TPYP. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEBL charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
WEBL vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a -19.84% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.05% return.
WEBL
- 1D
- -6.56%
- 1M
- -16.40%
- YTD
- -19.84%
- 6M
- -21.98%
- 1Y
- -13.17%
- 3Y*
- 26.91%
- 5Y*
- -23.34%
- 10Y*
- —
TPYP
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 6M
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 23.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
WEBL vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | -19.84% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 10.36% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.05% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBL and TPYP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.28 |
The correlation between WEBL and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WEBL vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEBL
TPYP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WEBL
TPYP
-
Communication Services
WEBL
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
WEBL
TPYP
-
Financial Services
WEBL
TPYP
Industrials
WEBL
TPYP
-
Healthcare
WEBL
TPYP
-
Basic Materials
WEBL
-
TPYP
Consumer Defensive
WEBL
-
TPYP
-
Energy
WEBL
-
TPYP
Real Estate
WEBL
-
TPYP
-
Utilities
WEBL
-
TPYP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBL vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
WEBL
TPYP
WEBL vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBL | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.30 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 3.42 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 8.48 | -8.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBL vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBL | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -51.91% | -42.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.57% | -6.84% | -49.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.82% | -13.17% | -47.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.44% | -17.96% | -76.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.40% | -5.28% | -71.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.95% | -7.88% | -51.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.84% | 2.76% | +24.08% |
Volatility
WEBL vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) has a higher volatility of 22.93% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 5.08%. This indicates that WEBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBL | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.93% | 5.08% | +17.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.83% | 10.33% | +36.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.99% | 13.30% | +45.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.00% | 17.39% | +63.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.87% | 21.93% | +60.94% |
WEBL vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBL vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than TPYP's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.25% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBL and TPYP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBL has higher volatility (22.93%) compared to TPYP (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 5-year performance, TPYP leads with 17.96% vs -23.34% for WEBL. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 17.96% return vs -23.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.25% for WEBL.
WEBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TPYP is Energy Equities. WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBL and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer