PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBL vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEBL vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 125.94% return.


WEBL

1D
0.57%
1M
13.84%
YTD
2.87%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
36.94%
5Y*
-16.60%
10Y*

NRGU

1D
-1.47%
1M
-6.46%
YTD
125.94%
6M
93.16%
1Y
171.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBL vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WEBL and NRGU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.03

The correlation between WEBL and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WEBL vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WEBL
NRGU

Technology

37.7%

-

Communication Services

29.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%

-

Financial Services

2.4%

-

Industrials

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

WEBL
37.7%
NRGU

-

Communication Services

WEBL
29.7%
NRGU

-

Consumer Cyclical

WEBL
27.7%
NRGU

-

Financial Services

WEBL
2.4%
NRGU

-

Industrials

WEBL
1.4%
NRGU

-

Healthcare

WEBL
1.1%
NRGU

-

Basic Materials

WEBL

-

NRGU

-

Consumer Defensive

WEBL

-

NRGU

-

Energy

WEBL

-

NRGU
100.0%

Real Estate

WEBL

-

NRGU

-

Utilities

WEBL

-

NRGU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBL vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBL
WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBL vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEBLNRGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.32

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

4.31

-4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

10.74

-10.47

WEBL vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBL and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEBLNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

2.31

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.43

-0.40

Drawdowns

WEBL vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBLNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-57.50%

-36.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.57%

-39.95%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.72%

-22.07%

-47.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-25.41%

-33.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.01%

16.01%

+10.00%

Volatility

WEBL vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) is 15.48%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a volatility of 31.62%. This indicates that WEBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBLNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.48%

31.62%

-16.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.37%

61.19%

-17.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.62%

75.02%

-18.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.65%

89.03%

-8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.85%

89.03%

-6.18%

WEBL vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEBL vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
0.19%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.79%0.00%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBL and NRGU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRGU has higher volatility (31.62%) compared to WEBL (15.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 171.19% vs 7.07% for WEBL. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 15.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 171.19% return vs 7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.

WEBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 0.95% for NRGU.

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBL and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer