WEAT vs. YFYA
WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) and YFYA (Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark, while YFYA is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Teucrium. WEAT is passively managed, while YFYA is actively managed. Over the past year, WEAT returned -0.35% vs 5.38% for YFYA. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. WEAT charges 1.91%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for YFYA.
Performance
WEAT vs. YFYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 13.52% return, which is significantly higher than YFYA's 2.34% return.
WEAT
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- 13.52%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- -0.35%
- 3Y*
- -10.48%
- 5Y*
- -7.95%
- 10Y*
- -6.84%
YFYA
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEAT vs. YFYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 13.52% | -19.31% |
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 2.34% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT and YFYA is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEAT vs. YFYA — Risk / Return Rank
WEAT
YFYA
WEAT vs. YFYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEAT | YFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.40 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.35 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 15.29 | -15.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEAT | YFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 1.50 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 1.10 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
WEAT vs. YFYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than YFYA's maximum drawdown of -2.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and YFYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEAT | YFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.32% | -2.29% | -82.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -1.61% | -16.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.12% | 0.00% | -82.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.12% | -0.33% | -62.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.29% | 0.35% | +10.94% |
Volatility
WEAT vs. YFYA - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA) at 1.14%. This indicates that WEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YFYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEAT | YFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 1.14% | +8.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.05% | 3.35% | +14.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.62% | 3.59% | +19.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.51% | 3.59% | +26.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 3.59% | +23.21% |
WEAT vs. YFYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than YFYA's 1.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEAT vs. YFYA - Dividend Comparison
WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 5.14% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEAT and YFYA have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEAT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to YFYA (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs YFYA's -2.29%.
On 1-year performance, YFYA leads with 5.38% vs -0.35% for WEAT. On fees, YFYA is cheaper at 1.16% per year. On volatility, YFYA has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YFYA has performed better with a 5.38% return vs -0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YFYA is cheaper with a 1.16% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.
YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 0.00% for WEAT.
WEAT is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while YFYA is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 1.91% for WEAT and 1.16% for YFYA.
YFYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEAT and YFYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer