PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEAT vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEAT vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 98.85% return.


WEAT

1D
2.91%
1M
5.75%
6M
16.62%
YTD
18.78%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
-10.15%
5Y*
-5.12%
10Y*
-5.23%

INSW

1D
6.63%
1M
13.42%
6M
77.43%
YTD
98.85%
1Y
149.26%
3Y*
48.58%
5Y*
51.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEAT vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
18.78%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%19.39%5.81%-1.35%-1.17%-12.79%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
98.85%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and INSW is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEAT vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEAT vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEATINSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.54

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

9.38

-9.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.48

25.88

-25.40

WEAT vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEATINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-57.49%

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-16.16%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.27%

-50.40%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.83%

-50.40%

-17.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.29%

-1.67%

-79.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.23%

-20.78%

-42.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.21%

5.85%

+2.36%

Volatility

WEAT vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 6.35%, while International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEATINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

16.78%

-10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.74%

29.47%

-10.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

38.18%

-16.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.33%

41.38%

-11.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.77%

45.41%

-18.64%

Dividends

WEAT vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
9.41%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEAT and INSW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (16.78%) compared to WEAT (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs INSW's -57.49%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEAT and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer