PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEAT vs. CF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEAT vs. CF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly lower than CF's 63.40% return. Over the past 10 years, WEAT has underperformed CF with an annualized return of -4.69%, while CF has yielded a comparatively higher 20.99% annualized return.


WEAT

1D
-3.29%
1M
6.29%
6M
13.54%
YTD
19.23%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
-10.44%
5Y*
-7.18%
10Y*
-4.69%
ALL TIME*
-10.45%

CF

1D
-0.46%
1M
15.75%
6M
35.55%
YTD
63.40%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
24.12%
10Y*
20.99%
ALL TIME*
21.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$259.19M$278.77M$321.72M
$15.37M$12.62M$15.36M

WEAT vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
19.23%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%19.39%5.81%-1.35%-1.17%-12.79%
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
63.40%-7.17%10.08%-4.75%22.29%87.18%-15.76%12.73%5.13%40.24%

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and CF is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.15

The correlation between WEAT and CF shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEAT vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CF
CF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WEAT vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEATCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.49

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

3.31

-1.64

WEAT vs. CF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the CF Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and CF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than CF's maximum drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and CF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEATCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-76.73%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

-25.45%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.21%

-29.16%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.83%

-48.36%

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

-60.74%

-7.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.22%

-8.65%

-72.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.30%

-24.87%

-38.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

11.44%

-5.67%

Volatility

WEAT vs. CF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 8.78%, while CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a volatility of 10.07%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEATCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

10.07%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

35.61%

-15.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

42.03%

-19.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.33%

38.14%

-7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

40.08%

-13.24%

Dividends

WEAT vs. CF - Dividend Comparison

WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.60%2.59%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEAT and CF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CF has higher volatility (10.07%) compared to WEAT (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs CF's -76.73%.

CF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEAT and CF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer