WDTE vs. XRMI
WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. WDTE is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Over the past year, WDTE returned 19.25% vs 9.03% for XRMI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDTE charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
WDTE vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.66% return.
WDTE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 9.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 7.90% | 13.60% | 9.85% | 5.71% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.66% | 4.60% | 15.18% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDTE and XRMI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between WDTE and XRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
WDTE vs. XRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDTE
XRMI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
WDTE
XRMI
Financial Services
WDTE
XRMI
Communication Services
WDTE
XRMI
Consumer Cyclical
WDTE
XRMI
Healthcare
WDTE
XRMI
Industrials
WDTE
XRMI
Consumer Defensive
WDTE
XRMI
Energy
WDTE
XRMI
Utilities
WDTE
XRMI
Real Estate
WDTE
XRMI
Basic Materials
WDTE
XRMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDTE vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
WDTE
XRMI
WDTE vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDTE | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.81 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | 7.28 | +4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDTE vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, roughly equal to the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDTE | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -15.31% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -5.02% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -0.52% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -5.87% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.24% | +0.41% |
Volatility
WDTE vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.71%. This indicates that WDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDTE | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 1.71% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 4.44% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.97% | 5.52% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 6.91% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 6.91% | +4.60% |
WDTE vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDTE vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.96%, more than XRMI's 12.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 32.96% | 35.78% | 51.80% | 16.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.73% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDTE and XRMI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDTE has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to XRMI (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs XRMI's -15.31%.
On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 19.25% vs 9.03% for XRMI. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 19.25% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.
WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 32.96%, compared with 12.73% for XRMI.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 0.60% for XRMI.
WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDTE and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer