WDTE vs. QQQI
WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WDTE returned 24.07% vs 30.41% for QQQI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WDTE charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
WDTE vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.
WDTE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 10.59% | 13.60% | 7.76% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.43% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDTE and QQQI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.85 |
The correlation between WDTE and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
WDTE vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDTE
QQQI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
WDTE
QQQI
Financial Services
WDTE
QQQI
Communication Services
WDTE
QQQI
Consumer Cyclical
WDTE
QQQI
Healthcare
WDTE
QQQI
Industrials
WDTE
QQQI
Consumer Defensive
WDTE
QQQI
Energy
WDTE
QQQI
Utilities
WDTE
QQQI
Real Estate
WDTE
QQQI
Basic Materials
WDTE
QQQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDTE vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
WDTE
QQQI
WDTE vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDTE | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.18 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 14.27 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDTE | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.35 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
WDTE vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDTE | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -20.00% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -9.61% | +1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.17% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -2.20% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 2.14% | -0.59% |
Volatility
WDTE vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) is 2.37%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that WDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDTE | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 2.68% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 9.85% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 12.98% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 17.07% | -5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.34% | 17.07% | -5.73% |
WDTE vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDTE vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, more than QQQI's 13.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.19% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% |
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 31.86% | 35.78% | 51.80% | 16.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDTE and QQQI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to WDTE (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 30.41% vs 24.07% for WDTE. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 30.41% return vs 24.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.
WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 31.86%, compared with 13.19% for QQQI.
WDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDTE and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer