WDNA vs. DGRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDNA is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDNA returned -4.78%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for DGRW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDNA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.

Performance

WDNA vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.87% return.

WDNA

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: 8.96%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 50.50%
• 3Y*: 3.54%
• 5Y*: -4.78%
• 10Y*: —

DGRW

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 21.83%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 12.33%
• 10Y*: 14.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDNA vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund	8.96%	22.68%	-14.18%	-2.07%	-26.29%	-5.27%
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	9.87%	12.17%	16.98%	18.66%	-6.33%	12.41%

Correlation

The correlation between WDNA and DGRW is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2021	0.62

The correlation between WDNA and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDNA vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WDNA	DGRW
Healthcare	85.0%	12.8%
Basic Materials	6.5%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	6.7%
Energy	1.1%	5.0%
Communication Services	-	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.1%
Financial Services	-	11.3%
Industrials	-	9.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	32.1%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

WDNA vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDNA

WDNA Risk / Return Rank: 63
WDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
WDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
WDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

DGRW

DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 66
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDNA vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WDNA	DGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.22	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	3.22	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.41	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	2.64	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	11.58	-1.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDNA vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDNA and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDNA	DGRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.22	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.89	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	0.86	-1.05

Drawdowns

WDNA vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and DGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDNA	DGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.87%	-32.04%	-26.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.70%	-8.30%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.25%	-16.21%	-22.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.87%	-17.27%	-41.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.86%	-0.12%	-29.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.64%	-3.01%	-32.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.14%	1.89%	+3.25%

Volatility

WDNA vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.49%. This indicates that WDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDNA	DGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	2.49%	+4.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.59%	7.67%	+8.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.66%	9.89%	+15.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.08%	13.97%	+11.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.07%	16.21%	+8.86%

WDNA vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDNA vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.26%	1.43%	1.55%	1.74%	2.15%	1.78%	1.93%	2.20%	2.42%	1.71%	2.13%	2.18%
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund	4.19%	4.57%	0.75%	0.80%	0.38%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDNA and DGRW in my portfolio?

WDNA and DGRW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDNA or DGRW?

WDNA has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to DGRW (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDNA dropped -58.87% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

Which ETF is better, WDNA or DGRW?

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 12.33% vs -4.78% for WDNA. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WDNA or DGRW?

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 12.33% return vs -4.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDNA or DGRW?

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WDNA or DGRW?

WDNA has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

What is the main difference between WDNA and DGRW?

WDNA is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. WDNA tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDNA and 0.28% for DGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.