PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WDIV vs. SEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WDIV vs. SEMA.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and SEMA.L (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while SEMA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WDIV returned 7.23%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for SEMA.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SEMA.L.

Performance

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WDIV is traded in USD, while SEMA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEMA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than SEMA.L's 20.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed SEMA.L with an annualized return of 7.23%, while SEMA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.49% annualized return.

WDIV

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
7.69%
6M
9.59%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
7.23%

SEMA.L

1D
-4.48%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
20.10%
6M
21.92%
1Y
44.50%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF		7.69%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-8.81%19.03%
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		20.10%34.53%7.56%8.93%-20.28%-2.49%18.20%17.14%-14.38%36.27%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and SEMA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013

0.59

The correlation between WDIV and SEMA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WDIV
SEMA.L

Financial Services

23.1%
17.8%

Utilities

13.8%
1.9%

Real Estate

13.3%
1.0%

Industrials

12.1%
6.8%

Communication Services

9.8%
6.2%

Energy

7.1%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
2.7%

Healthcare

4.6%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
8.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.9%

Technology

2.9%
42.9%

Financial Services

WDIV
23.1%
SEMA.L
17.8%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
SEMA.L
1.9%

Real Estate

WDIV
13.3%
SEMA.L
1.0%

Industrials

WDIV
12.1%
SEMA.L
6.8%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.8%
SEMA.L
6.2%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
SEMA.L
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.4%
SEMA.L
2.7%

Healthcare

WDIV
4.6%
SEMA.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
SEMA.L
8.6%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.1%
SEMA.L
5.9%

Technology

WDIV
2.9%
SEMA.L
42.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with WDIV:
WDIV vs. SCHDWDIV vs. SCHYWDIV vs. VYMWDIV vs. WLDRWDIV vs. VIGIWDIV vs. SPYWDIV vs. IVV
Often compared with SEMA.L:
SEMA.L vs. EMIM.LSEMA.L vs. EIMI.LSEMA.L vs. VFEG.LSEMA.L vs. VWRA.LSEMA.L vs. SWRD.MISEMA.L vs. EQQQ.LSEMA.L vs. EDIV

Return for Risk

WDIV vs. SEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
SEMA.L
SEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WDIVSEMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.04
2.27

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.93
2.99

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.41

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

12.49

-3.54

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the SEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and SEMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WDIVSEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.27

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.28

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.44

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.07

+0.40

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum SEMA.L drawdown of -53.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and SEMA.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WDIVSEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-53.58%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-12.96%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-21.27%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-36.87%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-39.72%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-7.03%

+5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-27.57%

+21.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

3.54%

-1.20%

Volatility

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 2.97%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) has a volatility of 8.91%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WDIVSEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

8.91%

-5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

16.97%

-8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

19.46%

-9.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

23.04%

-10.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

21.64%

-6.25%

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMA.L's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDIV vs. SEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, while SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF		4.06%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

WDIV and SEMA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEMA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEMA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.

WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while SEMA.L is Emerging Markets Equities. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while SEMA.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.18% for SEMA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and SEMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer