SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).
SEMA.L and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEMA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both SEMA.L and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SEMA.L or EQQQ.L.
Correlation
The correlation between SEMA.L and EQQQ.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SEMA.L:
0.15
EQQQ.L:
0.23
SEMA.L:
0.30
EQQQ.L:
0.45
SEMA.L:
1.04
EQQQ.L:
1.06
SEMA.L:
0.12
EQQQ.L:
0.20
SEMA.L:
0.50
EQQQ.L:
0.56
SEMA.L:
4.59%
EQQQ.L:
8.38%
SEMA.L:
15.62%
EQQQ.L:
20.59%
SEMA.L:
-31.87%
EQQQ.L:
-33.75%
SEMA.L:
-9.75%
EQQQ.L:
-14.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEMA.L achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's -10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMA.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 4.76%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.73% annualized return.
SEMA.L
0.39%
8.41%
-2.34%
2.32%
5.79%
4.76%
EQQQ.L
-10.90%
7.96%
-6.46%
4.83%
15.86%
18.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SEMA.L
EQQQ.L
SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
SEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEMA.L iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.37% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -31.87%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMA.L and EQQQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SEMA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (SEMA.L) is 8.41%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that SEMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.