WDIV vs. JGLO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and JGLO (Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WDIV is passively managed, while JGLO is actively managed. Over the past year, WDIV returned 19.92% vs 13.14% for JGLO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for JGLO.

Performance

WDIV vs. JGLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than JGLO's 3.31% return.

WDIV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 19.92%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: 7.81%

JGLO

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 3.31%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. JGLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF	7.89%	27.16%	7.61%	8.38%
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF	3.31%	14.07%	17.00%	8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and JGLO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.66

The correlation between WDIV and JGLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDIV vs. JGLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WDIV	JGLO
Financial Services	19.1%	17.3%
Real Estate	8.2%	1.5%
Utilities	7.5%	2.2%
Energy	7.4%	3.9%
Industrials	6.0%	7.8%
Communication Services	5.1%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	1.3%
Basic Materials	4.5%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	3.9%	16.1%
Technology	2.4%	31.6%
Healthcare	2.2%	8.6%

Return for Risk

WDIV vs. JGLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV

WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 57
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

JGLO

JGLO Risk / Return Rank: 32
JGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
JGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
JGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
JGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
JGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. JGLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WDIV	JGLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.08	+0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	1.56	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.20	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	1.39	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.53	5.59	+2.94

WDIV vs. JGLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the JGLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and JGLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. JGLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than JGLO's maximum drawdown of -16.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and JGLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDIV	JGLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.34%	-16.12%	-26.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.61%	-9.47%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.94%	-2.43%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.83%	-1.88%	-3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.35%	-0.01%

Volatility

WDIV vs. JGLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 3.05%, while Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDIV	JGLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	4.77%	-1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	9.99%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	12.24%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.77%	14.17%	-1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.24%	14.17%	+1.07%

WDIV vs. JGLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than JGLO's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDIV vs. JGLO - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than JGLO's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF	1.16%	1.20%	2.00%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF	4.29%	4.27%	4.63%	4.73%	5.12%	4.15%	5.55%	3.99%	4.42%	3.62%	4.32%	5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDIV and JGLO in my portfolio?

WDIV and JGLO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDIV or JGLO?

JGLO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to WDIV (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs JGLO's -16.12%.

Which ETF is better, WDIV or JGLO?

On 1-year performance, WDIV leads with 19.92% vs 13.14% for JGLO. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WDIV or JGLO?

Over the 1-year period, WDIV has performed better with a 19.92% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDIV or JGLO?

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for JGLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WDIV or JGLO?

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.16% for JGLO.

What is the main difference between WDIV and JGLO?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.47% for JGLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.