JGLO vs. PCGG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JGLO (Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF) and PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JGLO returned 13.14% vs -8.84% for PCGG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JGLO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PCGG.

Performance

JGLO vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGLO achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly higher than PCGG's -10.94% return.

JGLO

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 3.31%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCGG

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: -2.85%
• YTD: -10.94%
• 6M: -11.09%
• 1Y: -8.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGLO vs. PCGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF	3.31%	14.07%	17.00%	8.01%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	-10.94%	1.62%	12.40%	5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JGLO and PCGG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.80

The correlation between JGLO and PCGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

JGLO vs. PCGG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JGLO	PCGG
Technology	31.6%	40.1%
Financial Services	17.3%	17.5%
Consumer Cyclical	16.1%	9.4%
Healthcare	8.6%	13.0%
Communication Services	8.2%	15.8%
Industrials	7.8%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Real Estate	1.5%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	2.3%

Return for Risk

JGLO vs. PCGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGLO

JGLO Risk / Return Rank: 32
JGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
JGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
JGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
JGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
JGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PCGG

PCGG Risk / Return Rank: 5
PCGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PCGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PCGG Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PCGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PCGG Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGLO vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JGLO	PCGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	-0.56	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	-0.67	+2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.92	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	-0.39	+1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	-0.92	+6.51

JGLO vs. PCGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the PCGG Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGLO and PCGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JGLO vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGLO drawdown since its inception was -16.12%, smaller than the maximum PCGG drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLO and PCGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGLO	PCGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.12%	-22.66%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.47%	-22.66%	+13.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-15.40%	+12.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-5.10%	+3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	9.63%	-7.28%

Volatility

JGLO vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) is 4.77%, while Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that JGLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGLO	PCGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	6.36%	-1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.99%	13.09%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.24%	15.99%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.17%	16.81%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.17%	16.81%	-2.64%

JGLO vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGLO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGG's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

JGLO vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison

JGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF	1.16%	1.20%	2.00%	0.32%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JGLO and PCGG in my portfolio?

JGLO and PCGG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JGLO or PCGG?

PCGG has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to JGLO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGLO dropped -16.12% vs PCGG's -22.66%.

Which ETF is better, JGLO or PCGG?

On 1-year performance, JGLO leads with 13.14% vs -8.84% for PCGG. On fees, JGLO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, JGLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JGLO or PCGG?

Over the 1-year period, JGLO has performed better with a 13.14% return vs -8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JGLO or PCGG?

JGLO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JGLO or PCGG?

JGLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.

What is the main difference between JGLO and PCGG?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Polen. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for JGLO and 0.85% for PCGG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JGLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.