JGLO vs. PCGG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG).

JGLO and PCGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JGLO is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Sep 13, 2023. PCGG is an actively managed fund by Polen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2023.

Performance

JGLO vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JGLO vs. PCGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF	-3.55%	14.07%	17.00%	8.01%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	-16.12%	1.62%	12.40%	4.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGLO achieves a -3.55% return, which is significantly higher than PCGG's -16.12% return.

JGLO

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -5.54%
• YTD: -3.55%
• 6M: -2.52%
• 1Y: 12.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCGG

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: -7.21%
• YTD: -16.12%
• 6M: -18.32%
• 1Y: -9.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGLO vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGLO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGG's 0.85% expense ratio.

PCGG

Polen Capital Global Growth ETF

JGLO

Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF

Return for Risk

JGLO vs. PCGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGLO

JGLO Risk / Return Rank: 44
JGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
JGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
JGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
JGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 48

PCGG

PCGG Risk / Return Rank: 3
PCGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PCGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PCGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PCGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PCGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGLO vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JGLO	PCGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	-0.50	+1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	-0.61	+1.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.92	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	-0.44	+1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.46	-1.37	+5.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JGLO vs. PCGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the PCGG Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGLO and PCGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JGLO	PCGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	-0.50	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	-0.01	+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between JGLO and PCGG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

JGLO vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison

JGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JGLO Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF	1.25%	1.20%	2.00%	0.32%
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JGLO vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGLO drawdown since its inception was -16.12%, smaller than the maximum PCGG drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLO and PCGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGLO	PCGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.12%	-22.66%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-22.66%	+11.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.76%	-20.32%	+13.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-4.35%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	7.21%	-4.51%

Volatility

JGLO vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jpmorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) is 5.68%, while Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that JGLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGLO	PCGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	6.31%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.02%	11.66%	-2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.76%	19.79%	-3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.18%	16.64%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	16.64%	-2.46%