PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than HDEF's 3.99% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed HDEF with an annualized return of 7.48%, while HDEF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.


WDIV

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.41%
YTD
8.20%
6M
10.40%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
7.48%

HDEF

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
3.99%
6M
6.18%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
8.20%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-8.81%19.03%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.99%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and HDEF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.73

The correlation between WDIV and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WDIV vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
HDEF

Financial Services

23.1%
26.9%

Utilities

13.8%
8.4%

Real Estate

13.3%
0.9%

Industrials

12.1%
8.8%

Communication Services

9.8%
4.0%

Energy

7.1%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
17.9%

Healthcare

4.6%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
0.7%

Technology

2.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

WDIV
23.1%
HDEF
26.9%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
HDEF
8.4%

Real Estate

WDIV
13.3%
HDEF
0.9%

Industrials

WDIV
12.1%
HDEF
8.8%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.8%
HDEF
4.0%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
HDEF
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.4%
HDEF
17.9%

Healthcare

WDIV
4.6%
HDEF
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
HDEF
3.9%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.1%
HDEF
0.7%

Technology

WDIV
2.9%
HDEF
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDIVHDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

1.99

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

6.16

+3.23

WDIV vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDIVHDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.37

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.70

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.45

+0.02

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than HDEF's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-36.43%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-8.03%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-11.15%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-23.63%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-36.43%

-5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-5.69%

+4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-5.04%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.59%

-0.26%

Volatility

WDIV vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 2.95%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

3.75%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

9.20%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

11.67%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

14.14%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

16.24%

-0.84%

WDIV vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than HDEF's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.65%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.04%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and HDEF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDEF has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to WDIV (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

On 10-year performance, HDEF leads with 8.59% vs 7.48% for WDIV. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 3.65% for HDEF.

WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while HDEF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.20% for HDEF.

WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer