PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. HDAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. HDAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WDIV

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.41%
YTD
8.20%
6M
10.40%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
7.48%

HDAW

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. HDAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
8.20%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-8.81%19.03%
HDAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%6.53%16.58%-5.74%9.73%-3.67%22.40%-13.63%13.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and HDAW is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015

0.64

The correlation between WDIV and HDAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WDIV vs. HDAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
HDAW

Financial Services

23.1%
25.2%

Utilities

13.8%
4.0%

Real Estate

13.3%
1.8%

Industrials

12.1%
6.6%

Communication Services

9.8%
4.7%

Energy

7.1%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

4.6%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.1%
12.4%

Technology

2.9%
6.3%

Financial Services

WDIV
23.1%
HDAW
25.2%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
HDAW
4.0%

Real Estate

WDIV
13.3%
HDAW
1.8%

Industrials

WDIV
12.1%
HDAW
6.6%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.8%
HDAW
4.7%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
HDAW
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.4%
HDAW
10.1%

Healthcare

WDIV
4.6%
HDAW
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
HDAW
7.5%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.1%
HDAW
12.4%

Technology

WDIV
2.9%
HDAW
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. HDAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HDAW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. HDAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDIVHDAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

WDIV vs. HDAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDIVHDAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. HDAW - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVHDAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

Volatility

WDIV vs. HDAW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVHDAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

WDIV vs. HDAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HDAW's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. HDAW - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, while HDAW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%2.68%4.85%7.00%4.84%4.27%3.95%4.02%4.09%2.92%1.18%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.04%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and HDAW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDAW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDAW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 0.00% for HDAW.

WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while HDAW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while HDAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.20% for HDAW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and HDAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer