WDIV vs. DBE
WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WDIV returned 7.37%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for DBE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
WDIV vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 66.08% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed DBE with an annualized return of 7.37%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.
WDIV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
DBE
- 1D
- 6.87%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 62.18%
- YTD
- 66.08%
- 1Y
- 53.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
WDIV vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 10.31% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.21% | -6.92% | 14.44% | -10.18% | 20.12% | -8.81% | 19.03% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 66.08% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | -25.91% | 19.72% | -12.95% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDIV and DBE is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2013 | 0.27 |
The correlation between WDIV and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDIV vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
WDIV
DBE
WDIV vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDIV | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.16 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.58 | 6.57 | +2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDIV vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDIV | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -86.69% | +44.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -24.72% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.26% | -24.72% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -38.74% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.34% | -60.84% | +18.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -36.95% | +36.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -57.20% | +51.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 8.13% | -5.78% |
Volatility
WDIV vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 2.63%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDIV | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 12.49% | -9.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.33% | 32.73% | -24.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 36.03% | -25.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 29.89% | -17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 28.40% | -13.26% |
WDIV vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDIV vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than DBE's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.33% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.20% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDIV and DBE have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (12.49%) compared to WDIV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 11.15% vs 7.37% for WDIV. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 11.15% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 2.33% for DBE.
WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.78% for DBE.
WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDIV and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer