PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDH vs. ESLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WDH vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDH achieves a -24.98% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 48.00% return.


WDH

1D
-0.71%
1M
-11.39%
YTD
-24.98%
6M
-20.37%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
-14.35%
5Y*
-27.99%
10Y*

ESLT

1D
-6.48%
1M
9.58%
YTD
48.00%
6M
66.16%
1Y
98.98%
3Y*
60.86%
5Y*
46.38%
10Y*
26.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDH vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WDH
Waterdrop Inc.
-24.98%66.25%19.17%-68.77%141.30%-86.54%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
48.00%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%28.97%

Correlation

The correlation between WDH and ESLT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2021

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WDH:

$51.89M

ESLT:

$41.10B

EPS

WDH:

CN¥2.18

ESLT:

$12.36

PE Ratio

WDH:

4.35

ESLT:

69.08

PEG Ratio

WDH:

0.01

ESLT:

3.27

PS Ratio

WDH:

0.62

ESLT:

4.93

PB Ratio

WDH:

0.07

ESLT:

9.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

WDH:

CN¥3.96B

ESLT:

$8.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WDH:

CN¥2.02B

ESLT:

$2.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

WDH:

CN¥369.70M

ESLT:

$861.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDH vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDH
WDH Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
WDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDH Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDH vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDHESLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

3.83

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

10.61

-10.25

WDH vs. ESLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDH Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the ESLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDH and ESLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDH vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDH drawdown since its inception was -91.12%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDH and ESLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDHESLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.12%

-53.79%

-37.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.00%

-25.98%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.60%

-25.98%

-36.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.67%

-32.89%

-55.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.92%

-15.71%

-69.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.15%

-13.91%

-67.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.81%

9.36%

+4.45%

Volatility

WDH vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) is 13.33%, while Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a volatility of 19.89%. This indicates that WDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDHESLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

19.89%

-6.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.40%

35.93%

-11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.58%

44.11%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.87%

33.66%

+28.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.73%

29.42%

+33.31%

Dividends

WDH vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison

WDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than ESLT's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.36%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%
WDH
Waterdrop Inc.
4.29%2.63%5.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WDH vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waterdrop Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
1.39B
2.19B
(WDH) Total Revenue
(ESLT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WDH values in CNY, ESLT values in USD

WDH vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Waterdrop Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
52.0%
25.2%
Portfolio components
WDH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported a gross profit of 723.78M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

WDH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported an operating income of 82.71M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

WDH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waterdrop Inc. reported a net income of 159.88M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WDH and ESLT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESLT has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to WDH (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDH dropped -91.12% vs ESLT's -53.79%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDH and ESLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer