WDGF vs. URNM
WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) and URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDGF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while URNM is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.
Performance
WDGF vs. URNM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 11.97% return.
WDGF
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URNM
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 52.67%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- —
WDGF vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 3.03% | -0.25% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 11.97% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDGF and URNM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDGF vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank
WDGF
URNM
WDGF vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDGF | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.67 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
WDGF vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum URNM drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and URNM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDGF | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -50.78% | +36.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.77% | -26.82% | +14.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -18.03% | +12.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.71% | — |
Volatility
WDGF vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDGF | URNM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 51.69% | -29.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 48.30% | -25.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 46.90% | -24.49% |
WDGF vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDGF vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison
WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than URNM's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.84% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDGF and URNM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
WDGF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while URNM is Commodity Producers Equities. WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while URNM tracks North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.85% for URNM.
Find the right allocation for WDGF and URNM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer