WDGF vs. QQQ
WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDGF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
WDGF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
WDGF
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
WDGF vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 3.03% | -0.25% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDGF and QQQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDGF vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
WDGF
QQQ
WDGF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDGF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.41 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
WDGF vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDGF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -82.97% | +68.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.77% | -0.26% | -12.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -32.79% | +27.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
WDGF vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDGF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 15.94% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 22.38% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 22.29% | +0.12% |
WDGF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDGF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDGF and QQQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDGF.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
WDGF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for WDGF and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer