WDGF vs. FOWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) and FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDGF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WDGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FOWF.

Performance

WDGF vs. FOWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than FOWF's 9.44% return.

WDGF

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FOWF

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 12.30%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDGF vs. FOWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	3.03%	-0.25%
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	9.44%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WDGF and FOWF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

WDGF vs. FOWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOWF

FOWF Risk / Return Rank: 46
FOWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FOWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FOWF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FOWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FOWF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDGF vs. FOWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WDGF	FOWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	1.63	-1.46

Drawdowns

WDGF vs. FOWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, which is greater than FOWF's maximum drawdown of -12.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and FOWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDGF	FOWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-12.29%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.77%	-2.81%	-9.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-2.05%	-3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WDGF	FOWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.41%	13.94%	+8.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.41%	16.89%	+5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.41%	16.89%	+5.52%

WDGF vs. FOWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FOWF's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDGF vs. FOWF - Dividend Comparison

WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than FOWF's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	0.73%	0.79%
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund	0.05%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDGF and FOWF in my portfolio?

WDGF and FOWF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WDGF or FOWF?

On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDGF or FOWF?

WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FOWF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WDGF or FOWF?

FOWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.

What is the main difference between WDGF and FOWF?

WDGF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FOWF is Industrials Equities. WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.49% for FOWF.