PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDGF vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDGF vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return.


WDGF

1D
1.43%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
4.50%
6M
8.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDGF vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WDGF and BIL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDGF vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDGF

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDGF vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WDGF vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDGFBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

2.78

-2.51

Drawdowns

WDGF vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDGFBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-0.78%

-13.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.53%

0.00%

-11.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-0.26%

-5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

WDGF vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDGFBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

0.20%

+22.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

0.26%

+22.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

0.26%

+22.15%

WDGF vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDGF vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
WDGF
WisdomTree Global Defense Fund
0.05%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDGF and BIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDGF.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.

WDGF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BIL is Government Bonds. WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.14% for BIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDGF and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer