WDGF vs. BIL
WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDGF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. WDGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
WDGF vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return.
WDGF
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
WDGF vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 4.50% | -0.25% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.49% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDGF and BIL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDGF vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
WDGF
BIL
WDGF vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDGF | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 19.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 13.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 2.78 | -2.51 |
Drawdowns
WDGF vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDGF | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -0.78% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.53% | 0.00% | -11.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -0.26% | -5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
WDGF vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDGF | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 0.20% | +22.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 0.26% | +22.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 0.26% | +22.15% |
WDGF vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDGF vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDGF and BIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDGF.
BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
WDGF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while BIL is Government Bonds. WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.14% for BIL.
Find the right allocation for WDGF and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer