PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDFC vs. V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WDFC vs. V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WD-40 Company (WDFC) and Visa Inc. (V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDFC achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than V's -9.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WDFC has underperformed V with an annualized return of 7.66%, while V has yielded a comparatively higher 15.59% annualized return.


WDFC

1D
1.22%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.73%
1Y
-15.57%
3Y*
1.94%
5Y*
-2.78%
10Y*
7.66%

V

1D
-1.69%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-9.15%
6M
-3.33%
1Y
-12.45%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDFC vs. V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDFC
WD-40 Company
2.21%-17.43%2.93%50.89%-33.01%-6.89%38.84%7.42%57.67%2.81%
V
Visa Inc.
-9.15%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WDFC and V is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2008

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between WDFC and V has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

WDFC:

$5.91

V:

$15.24

PE Ratio

WDFC:

33.74

V:

20.82

PEG Ratio

WDFC:

4.31

V:

1.28

PS Ratio

WDFC:

4.24

V:

10.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

WDFC:

$636.48M

V:

$43.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WDFC:

$354.31M

V:

$16.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

WDFC:

$108.24M

V:

$27.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDFC vs. V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDFC
WDFC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WDFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDFC Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WDFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDFC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDFC vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WD-40 Company (WDFC) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDFCVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.59

-0.57

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.68

-0.69

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.61

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.13

-1.14

+0.01

WDFC vs. V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDFC Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is comparable to the V Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDFC and V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDFCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

-0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.34

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.64

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.69

-0.34

Drawdowns

WDFC vs. V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDFC drawdown since its inception was -54.20%, roughly equal to the maximum V drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDFC and V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDFCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.20%

-51.90%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.03%

-20.38%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

-20.38%

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.03%

-28.60%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.20%

-36.36%

-17.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.78%

-14.33%

-20.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-8.26%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.77%

10.89%

+3.88%

Volatility

WDFC vs. V - Volatility Comparison

WD-40 Company (WDFC) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Visa Inc. (V) at 5.00%. This indicates that WDFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDFCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

5.00%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

17.23%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.37%

22.06%

+4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.61%

22.76%

+7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.46%

24.45%

+5.01%

Dividends

WDFC vs. V - Dividend Comparison

WDFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than V's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
V
Visa Inc.
0.82%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%
WDFC
WD-40 Company
1.97%1.91%1.45%1.39%1.94%1.16%1.01%1.26%1.18%1.66%1.44%1.16%

Financials

WDFC vs. V - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WD-40 Company and Visa Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
161.67M
11.23B
(WDFC) Total Revenue
(V) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WDFC vs. V - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WD-40 Company and Visa Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
55.6%
-79.3%
Portfolio components
WDFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WD-40 Company reported a gross profit of 89.94M and revenue of 161.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a gross profit of -8.90B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -79.3%.

WDFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WD-40 Company reported an operating income of 26.29M and revenue of 161.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported an operating income of 7.23B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 64.4%.

WDFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WD-40 Company reported a net income of 20.32M and revenue of 161.67M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc. reported a net income of 6.02B and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 53.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WDFC and V have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDFC has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to V (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDFC dropped -54.20% vs V's -51.90%.

V currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDFC and V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer