PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDC vs. LYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WDC vs. LYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Digital Corporation (WDC) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDC achieves a 206.10% return, which is significantly higher than LYG's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, WDC has outperformed LYG with an annualized return of 32.86%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.00% annualized return.


WDC

1D
2.97%
1M
9.81%
YTD
206.10%
6M
210.59%
1Y
852.85%
3Y*
160.14%
5Y*
56.39%
10Y*
32.86%

LYG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
2.45%
6M
6.89%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
39.69%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
8.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDC vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
206.10%283.68%13.86%65.99%-51.62%17.73%-10.89%77.14%-51.90%19.83%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
2.45%103.71%20.30%14.68%-9.47%33.81%-40.79%36.81%-28.35%30.79%

Correlation

The correlation between WDC and LYG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2001

0.33

Fundamentals

EPS

WDC:

$23.29

LYG:

$0.45

PE Ratio

WDC:

22.63

LYG:

11.86

PEG Ratio

WDC:

0.53

LYG:

5.93

PS Ratio

WDC:

12.46

LYG:

0.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

WDC:

$11.78B

LYG:

$65.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WDC:

$5.35B

LYG:

$65.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

WDC:

$10.88B

LYG:

$7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDC vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDC
WDC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
WDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDC Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDC Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

LYG
LYG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDC vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Digital Corporation (WDC) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDCLYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+12.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.20

+0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

41.84

1.38

+40.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

146.77

3.85

+142.92

WDC vs. LYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDC Sharpe Ratio is 13.33, which is higher than the LYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDC and LYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDCLYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33

1.12

+12.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.63

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.22

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

-0.03

+0.23

Drawdowns

WDC vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDC drawdown since its inception was -96.20%, roughly equal to the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDC and LYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDCLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.20%

-94.84%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.59%

-22.72%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.65%

-22.72%

-26.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.68%

-40.19%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

-68.72%

-1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.28%

-57.66%

+46.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.09%

-63.42%

+11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

8.15%

-2.29%

Volatility

WDC vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison

Western Digital Corporation (WDC) has a higher volatility of 20.86% compared to Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) at 8.88%. This indicates that WDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDCLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.86%

8.88%

+11.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.91%

21.77%

+31.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.74%

28.07%

+36.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.62%

32.06%

+16.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.52%

36.52%

+12.00%

Dividends

WDC vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison

WDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than LYG's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.76%3.19%5.44%5.23%4.92%2.70%0.00%5.04%6.63%6.81%5.17%2.11%
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
0.09%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.81%2.36%5.41%2.51%2.94%3.33%

Financials

WDC vs. LYG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Western Digital Corporation and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
3.34B
5.18B
(WDC) Total Revenue
(LYG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WDC vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Western Digital Corporation and Lloyds Banking Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
50.2%
100.0%
Portfolio components
WDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 3.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

WDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.

WDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Western Digital Corporation reported a net income of 3.21B and revenue of 3.34B, resulting in a net margin of 96.0%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WDC and LYG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDC has higher volatility (20.86%) compared to LYG (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDC dropped -96.20% vs LYG's -94.84%.

WDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.33 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDC and LYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer