WDAF vs. DGRW
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while DGRW is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
WDAF vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 10.05% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- 6M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DGRW
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.74M | $49.20M | $56.02M | |
| $216.97K | $187.82K | $494.71K |
WDAF vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 1.82% | -7.71% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 10.05% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and DGRW is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRW
WDAF vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDAF | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -32.04% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.59% | 0.00% | -23.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -3.00% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.45% | 10.47% | +22.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 14.02% | +19.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 16.19% | +17.26% |
WDAF vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than DGRW's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.26% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and DGRW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.13% for WDAF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DGRW is Quality Factor. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.28% for DGRW.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer