PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WCOD.L is traded in USD, while XSCD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSCD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOD.L achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly lower than XSCD.L's -0.39% return.


WCOD.L

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-2.54%
6M
-1.31%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
11.13%

XSCD.L

1D
0.52%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
0.72%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WCOD.L
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF
-2.54%8.15%21.52%35.76%-33.88%18.10%48.07%
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
-0.39%5.28%32.25%46.38%-39.64%22.46%56.72%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOD.L and XSCD.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2020

0.52

The correlation between WCOD.L and XSCD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCOD.L
XSCD.L

Consumer Cyclical

96.3%
97.8%

Technology

2.9%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%

-

Communication Services

0.1%
1.2%

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

WCOD.L
96.3%
XSCD.L
97.8%

Technology

WCOD.L
2.9%
XSCD.L
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

WCOD.L
0.6%
XSCD.L

-

Communication Services

WCOD.L
0.1%
XSCD.L
1.2%

Industrials

WCOD.L
0.1%
XSCD.L

-

Basic Materials

WCOD.L

-

XSCD.L

-

Energy

WCOD.L

-

XSCD.L

-

Financial Services

WCOD.L

-

XSCD.L

-

Healthcare

WCOD.L

-

XSCD.L

-

Real Estate

WCOD.L

-

XSCD.L

-

Utilities

WCOD.L

-

XSCD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOD.L
WCOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XSCD.L
XSCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCOD.LXSCD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.16

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

1.35

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.51

3.52

-2.01

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOD.L and XSCD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCOD.LXSCD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

0.93

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.39

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.75

+0.03

Drawdowns

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum XSCD.L drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and XSCD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCOD.LXSCD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-41.85%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-15.15%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-26.56%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.26%

-41.85%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-4.27%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-14.40%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.42%

9.52%

-4.10%

Volatility

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) have volatilities of 5.99% and 5.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCOD.LXSCD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

5.72%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

15.26%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

21.93%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.42%

28.90%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

33.15%

-7.72%

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XSCD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCOD.L vs. XSCD.L - Dividend Comparison

WCOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
WCOD.L
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.45%0.44%0.40%0.60%0.88%0.36%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCOD.L and XSCD.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSCD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSCD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOD.L.

Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOD.L and 0.12% for XSCD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCOD.L and XSCD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer