PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
-8.83%-1.95%35.07%37.43%-32.18%23.87%5.27%
ESIC.L
iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-18.15%7.11%-1.15%12.93%-11.01%14.25%5.78%
Different Trading Currencies

XSCD.L is traded in GBp, while ESIC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSCD.L achieves a -8.83% return, which is significantly higher than ESIC.L's -18.15% return.


XSCD.L

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
-8.83%
6M
-8.24%
1Y
10.31%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*

ESIC.L

1D
0.81%
1M
-13.30%
YTD
-18.15%
6M
-14.11%
1Y
-9.20%
3Y*
-5.87%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSCD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIC.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSCD.L
XSCD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSCD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIC.L
ESIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSCD.LESIC.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

-0.49

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

-0.57

+1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.93

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

-0.46

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.01

-1.42

+2.43

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSCD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSCD.L and ESIC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSCD.LESIC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

-0.49

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.07

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.05

+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between XSCD.L and ESIC.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Dividend Comparison

XSCD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while ESIC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XSCD.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.50%0.44%0.40%0.60%0.88%0.36%0.58%0.00%
ESIC.L
iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSCD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than ESIC.L's maximum drawdown of -28.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSCD.L and ESIC.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSCD.LESIC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-28.93%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-21.82%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.70%

-28.93%

-5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.14%

-21.84%

+7.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-9.12%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

7.10%

+4.81%

Volatility

XSCD.L vs. ESIC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XSCD.L) is 6.15%, while iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that XSCD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSCD.LESIC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.15%

6.86%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.65%

13.21%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.69%

18.69%

+9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.91%

20.54%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.29%

20.20%

+10.09%