WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE).
WCOD.L and CEMG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WCOD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. CEMG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jun 6, 2014. Both WCOD.L and CEMG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCOD.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF | -9.64% | 8.15% | 21.52% | 35.76% | -33.88% | 18.10% | 37.61% | 25.41% | -5.63% | 23.02% |
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -8.05% | 13.86% | 10.24% | 4.91% | -20.71% | -8.87% | 22.17% | 22.86% | -20.60% | 40.77% |
Different Trading Currencies
WCOD.L is traded in USD, while CEMG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CEMG.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCOD.L achieves a -9.64% return, which is significantly lower than CEMG.DE's -8.05% return.
WCOD.L
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -11.99%
- 1Y
- -0.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WCOD.L
CEMG.DE
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCOD.L | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | -0.01 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.11 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.01 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | -0.02 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.72 | -0.05 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCOD.L | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | -0.01 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | -0.14 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.15 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOD.L and CEMG.DE is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCOD.L nor CEMG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum CEMG.DE drawdown of -46.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and CEMG.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCOD.L | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -33.94% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -14.05% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.26% | -31.08% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.77% | -18.59% | +5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -12.18% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 5.35% | -0.47% |
Volatility
WCOD.L vs. CEMG.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) at 5.78%. This indicates that WCOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WCOD.L | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 5.78% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 10.30% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 17.21% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 20.30% | +3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 19.45% | +6.03% |