WCOD.L vs. XDWC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L).
WCOD.L and XDWC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WCOD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. XDWC.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 14, 2016. Both WCOD.L and XDWC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WCOD.L or XDWC.L.
Key characteristics
| WCOD.L | XDWC.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.96% | 3.81% |
| 1Y Return | 20.26% | 20.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.75% | 1.67% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.74% | 10.67% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.14 | 1.15 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.98% | 16.77% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.26% | -37.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.24% | -10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOD.L and XDWC.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WCOD.L vs. XDWC.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WCOD.L having a 3.96% return and XDWC.L slightly lower at 3.81%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WCOD.L vs. XDWC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWC.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WCOD.L vs. XDWC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WCOD.L vs. XDWC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCOD.L nor XDWC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WCOD.L vs. XDWC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWC.L drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and XDWC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WCOD.L vs. XDWC.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.L) have volatilities of 5.14% and 4.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.