WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WCOD.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF) and XLYP.L (Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from State Street and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L returned 11.13%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for XLYP.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCOD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLYP.L.

Performance

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WCOD.L is traded in USD, while XLYP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLYP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCOD.L achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly higher than XLYP.L's -2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOD.L has underperformed XLYP.L with an annualized return of 11.13%, while XLYP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.

WCOD.L

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: -2.54%
• 6M: -1.31%
• 1Y: 8.23%
• 3Y*: 12.82%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

XLYP.L

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: -2.93%
• 6M: -1.13%
• 1Y: 9.65%
• 3Y*: 15.45%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: 12.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WCOD.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF	-2.54%	8.15%	21.52%	35.76%	-33.88%	18.10%	37.61%	25.41%	-5.63%	23.02%
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF	-2.93%	7.79%	28.49%	39.29%	-34.04%	29.46%	25.89%	29.14%	0.22%	21.88%

Correlation

The correlation between WCOD.L and XLYP.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016	0.58

Over the past year, WCOD.L and XLYP.L have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCOD.L	XLYP.L
Consumer Cyclical	96.3%	98.8%
Technology	2.9%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.6%	-
Communication Services	0.1%	-
Industrials	0.1%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCOD.L

WCOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
WCOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
WCOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
WCOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WCOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

XLYP.L

XLYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) and Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCOD.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	0.57	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	0.95	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.10	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	0.68	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.51	2.04	-0.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCOD.L and XLYP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCOD.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	0.57	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.39	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.62	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.62	+0.16

Drawdowns

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCOD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum XLYP.L drawdown of -37.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOD.L and XLYP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCOD.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.26%	-37.56%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	-14.08%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.04%	-25.99%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.26%	-37.56%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.26%	-37.56%	+1.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.91%	-6.24%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-7.55%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.42%	4.71%	+0.71%

Volatility

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) at 5.32%. This indicates that WCOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLYP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCOD.L	XLYP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	5.32%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	12.64%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	16.76%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.42%	21.71%	+2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	20.63%	+4.80%

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCOD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCOD.L vs. XLYP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCOD.L nor XLYP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCOD.L and XLYP.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, WCOD.L and XLYP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, WCOD.L or XLYP.L?

On fees, XLYP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCOD.L or XLYP.L?

XLYP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOD.L.

What is the main difference between WCOD.L and XLYP.L?

Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOD.L and 0.14% for XLYP.L.