PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLYP.L vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLYP.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLYP.L achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -4.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLYP.L having a 13.68% annualized return and BRK-B not far ahead at 13.88%.


XLYP.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-2.69%
6M
-2.73%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
13.68%

BRK-B

1D
0.00%
1M
3.19%
YTD
-4.39%
6M
-5.72%
1Y
-0.95%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLYP.L
Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF
-2.69%0.23%30.67%32.31%-26.14%30.65%22.15%24.16%6.23%11.28%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-1.91%2.99%29.31%9.69%15.59%30.17%-0.64%6.71%9.11%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XLYP.L and BRK-B is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between XLYP.L and BRK-B has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLYP.L
XLYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYP.LBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.00

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

-0.08

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

-0.17

+2.49

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLYP.L and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYP.LBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

-0.06

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.69

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.70

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.59

+0.16

Drawdowns

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLYP.L drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYP.L and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYP.LBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.40%

-37.92%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-11.88%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.52%

-17.26%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-20.84%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-21.44%

-8.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-13.90%

+7.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-7.39%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

5.52%

-0.92%

Volatility

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.84%. This indicates that XLYP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYP.LBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

3.84%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

11.84%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

15.33%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

16.89%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

19.85%

+0.01%

Dividends

XLYP.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLYP.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLYP.L and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLYP.L and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer