WCLD vs. ASMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WCLD (WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WCLD tracks the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WCLD returned -16.84% vs 135.41% for ASMH. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WCLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

WCLD vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCLD achieves a -16.34% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 71.95% return.

WCLD

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: -16.34%
• 6M: -17.42%
• 1Y: -16.84%
• 3Y*: -1.60%
• 5Y*: -12.33%
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -7.22%
• 1M: 10.92%
• YTD: 71.95%
• 6M: 74.08%
• 1Y: 135.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCLD vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund	-16.34%	17.17%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	71.95%	59.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WCLD and ASMH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

WCLD vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCLD

WCLD Risk / Return Rank: 5
WCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
WCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
WCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
WCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
WCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 91
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCLD vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCLD	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	3.26	-3.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.48	3.65	-4.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.46	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	8.57	-9.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	22.08	-23.19

WCLD vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCLD and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCLD vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCLD drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCLD and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCLD	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.90%	-15.89%	-49.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.68%	-15.89%	-18.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.17%	-7.22%	-47.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.66%	-4.19%	-31.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.20%	6.16%	+9.04%

Volatility

WCLD vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) is 15.36%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 17.40%. This indicates that WCLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCLD	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.36%	17.40%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.45%	33.27%	-2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.22%	41.85%	-6.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.46%	40.28%	-2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.40%	40.28%	-2.88%

WCLD vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCLD vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

WCLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.62%	0.19%
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCLD and ASMH in my portfolio?

WCLD and ASMH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCLD or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (17.40%) compared to WCLD (15.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCLD dropped -64.90% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, WCLD or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 135.41% vs -16.84% for WCLD. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WCLD has been the lower-risk option at 15.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCLD or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 135.41% return vs -16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCLD or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WCLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCLD or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for WCLD.

What is the main difference between WCLD and ASMH?

WCLD tracks BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCLD and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.