WCEO vs. SMLF
WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) and SMLF (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. WCEO is actively managed, while SMLF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WCEO returned 14.56%/yr vs 19.85%/yr for SMLF. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WCEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SMLF.
Performance
WCEO vs. SMLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCEO achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than SMLF's 14.46% return.
WCEO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMLF
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 14.46%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 30.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
WCEO vs. SMLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 11.34% | 9.77% | 8.28% | 11.35% |
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 14.46% | 12.30% | 16.33% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCEO and SMLF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2023 | 0.94 |
The correlation between WCEO and SMLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
WCEO vs. SMLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCEO
SMLF
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
WCEO
SMLF
Technology
WCEO
SMLF
Consumer Cyclical
WCEO
SMLF
Industrials
WCEO
SMLF
Healthcare
WCEO
SMLF
Energy
WCEO
SMLF
Real Estate
WCEO
SMLF
Basic Materials
WCEO
SMLF
Communication Services
WCEO
SMLF
Consumer Defensive
WCEO
SMLF
Utilities
WCEO
SMLF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCEO vs. SMLF — Risk / Return Rank
WCEO
SMLF
WCEO vs. SMLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCEO | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 3.57 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.47 | 12.27 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCEO | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.81 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.54 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
WCEO vs. SMLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCEO drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, smaller than the maximum SMLF drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCEO and SMLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCEO | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -41.89% | +16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -8.71% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.88% | -26.28% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.72% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -6.60% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.53% | -0.30% |
Volatility
WCEO vs. SMLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) is 3.34%, while iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that WCEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCEO | SMLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 4.80% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 12.31% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 17.21% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 21.09% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 21.78% | -3.65% |
WCEO vs. SMLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCEO vs. SMLF - Dividend Comparison
WCEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SMLF's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 0.78% | 0.79% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.88% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, WCEO and SMLF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMLF has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to WCEO (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCEO dropped -25.88% vs SMLF's -41.89%.
On 3-year performance, SMLF leads with 19.85% vs 14.56% for WCEO. On fees, SMLF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, WCEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 19.85% return vs 14.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.
SMLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.58% for WCEO.
They also come from different issuers: Hypatia Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCEO and 0.30% for SMLF.
WCEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCEO and SMLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer