WCCFX vs. VTMFX
WCCFX (Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, WCCFX returned 2.88%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for VTMFX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCCFX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
WCCFX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WCCFX having a 5.12% return and VTMFX slightly higher at 5.23%. Over the past 10 years, WCCFX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
WCCFX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 11.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
VTMFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
WCCFX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCCFX Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund | 5.12% | 8.15% | 3.29% | 5.96% | -13.92% | 2.63% | 8.75% | 10.72% | -4.34% | 5.74% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 5.23% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCCFX and VTMFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.70 |
The correlation between WCCFX and VTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCCFX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
WCCFX
VTMFX
WCCFX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCCFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 2.91 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.33 | 13.60 | -3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCCFX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCCFX drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, smaller than the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCCFX and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCCFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.64% | -28.49% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | -5.38% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.93% | -10.61% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -17.40% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.64% | -21.87% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.75% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -3.54% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.15% | +0.01% |
Volatility
WCCFX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.45%. This indicates that WCCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCCFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 2.45% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.33% | 5.18% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.85% | 6.46% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.96% | 8.57% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 9.15% | -3.94% |
WCCFX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCCFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCCFX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
WCCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VTMFX's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
WCCFX Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund | 2.59% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 2.22% | 3.41% | 5.98% | 6.19% | 1.81% | 5.05% | 5.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCCFX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCCFX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to VTMFX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCCFX dropped -17.64% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCCFX and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer