WCC vs. GTX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX).

Performance

WCC vs. GTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WCC vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WCC WESCO International, Inc.	12.06%	36.43%	5.09%	40.19%	-4.86%	67.63%	32.18%	23.73%	-20.46%
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	4.66%	97.23%	-6.62%	26.90%	-5.11%	81.26%	-55.66%	-19.04%	-35.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WCC : $13.52B GTX : $3.59B
EPS WCC : $13.05 GTX : $1.54
PE Ratio WCC : 20.97 GTX : 11.82
PEG Ratio WCC : 1.09 GTX : 0.09
PS Ratio WCC : 0.58 GTX : 1.02
Total Revenue (TTM) WCC : $23.50B GTX : $3.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) WCC : $3.62B GTX : $850.00M
EBITDA (TTM) WCC : $1.44B GTX : $429.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCC achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than GTX's 4.66% return.

WCC

• 1D: 6.41%
• 1M: -5.30%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 29.84%
• 1Y: 77.64%
• 3Y*: 22.10%
• 5Y*: 26.50%
• 10Y*: 17.75%

GTX

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.40%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 34.58%
• 1Y: 121.27%
• 3Y*: 34.50%
• 5Y*: 28.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WCC vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCC

WCC Risk / Return Rank: 88
WCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
WCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
WCC Omega Ratio Rank: 84
WCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
WCC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GTX

GTX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCC vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCC	GTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.66	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	3.68	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.50	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	6.36	-2.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	17.23	-5.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WCC vs. GTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the GTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCC and GTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCC	GTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.66	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.71	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.01	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between WCC and GTX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WCC vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison

WCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than GTX's 1.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
WCC WESCO International, Inc.	0.68%	0.74%	0.91%	0.86%
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	1.54%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WCC vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCC drawdown since its inception was -86.28%, smaller than the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCC and GTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCC	GTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.28%	-93.08%	+6.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.54%	-19.87%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.37%	-35.76%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.04%	-14.16%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.02%	-52.11%	+17.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.49%	7.34%	-0.85%

Volatility

WCC vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison

WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) has a higher volatility of 14.45% compared to Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) at 11.54%. This indicates that WCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCC	GTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.45%	11.54%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.92%	31.84%	-1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.03%	45.95%	-2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.29%	40.79%	+3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.70%	63.75%	-19.05%

Financials

WCC vs. GTX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WESCO International, Inc. and Garrett Motion Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a gross profit of 185.00M and revenue of 891.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

WCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported an operating income of 324.60M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

GTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported an operating income of -405.00M and revenue of 891.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -45.5%.

WCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported a net income of 165.20M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

GTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a net income of 84.00M and revenue of 891.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.