WCC vs. GTX
WCC (WESCO International, Inc.) and GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) are both stocks. WCC operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, WCC returned 27.20%/yr vs 37.74%/yr for GTX. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WCC vs. GTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCC achieves a 40.88% return, which is significantly lower than GTX's 79.86% return.
WCC
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 19.08%
- YTD
- 40.88%
- 1Y
- 70.00%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 27.20%
- 10Y*
- 20.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.14%
GTX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 73.78%
- YTD
- 79.86%
- 1Y
- 145.52%
- 3Y*
- 59.53%
- 5Y*
- 37.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $74.68M | $73.43M | $92.59M | |
| $255.89M | $266.79M | $225.20M |
WCC vs. GTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCC WESCO International, Inc. | 40.88% | 36.43% | 5.09% | 40.19% | -4.86% | 67.63% | 32.18% | 23.73% | -20.73% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 79.86% | 97.23% | -6.62% | 26.90% | -5.11% | 81.26% | -55.66% | -19.04% | -43.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCC and GTX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2018 | 0.34 |
The correlation between WCC and GTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WCC:
$16.73B
GTX:
$5.81B
WCC:
$14.35
GTX:
$1.82
WCC:
23.93
GTX:
17.09
WCC:
1.22
GTX:
0.14
WCC:
0.68
GTX:
1.63
WCC:
$25.01B
GTX:
$3.75B
WCC:
$2.48B
GTX:
$881.00M
WCC:
$1.57B
GTX:
$482.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCC vs. GTX — Risk / Return Rank
WCC
GTX
WCC vs. GTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCC | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.54 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 6.98 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 19.97 | -10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCC vs. GTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCC drawdown since its inception was -86.28%, smaller than the maximum GTX drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCC and GTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCC | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.28% | -93.91% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.54% | -20.56% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.37% | -26.82% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.37% | -31.49% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.15% | -14.02% | +5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -55.52% | +20.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 7.19% | +0.20% |
Volatility
WCC vs. GTX - Volatility Comparison
WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) has a higher volatility of 16.33% compared to Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) at 13.44%. This indicates that WCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCC | GTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.33% | 13.44% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.07% | 38.03% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.60% | 49.35% | -5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.10% | 41.63% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 63.83% | -18.58% |
Dividends
WCC vs. GTX - Dividend Comparison
WCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than GTX's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.96% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WCC WESCO International, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.86% |
Financials
WCC vs. GTX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WESCO International, Inc. and Garrett Motion Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WCC vs. GTX - Profitability Comparison
WCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.24B and revenue of 6.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -18.6%.
GTX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 976.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.
WCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported an operating income of 382.20M and revenue of 6.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.
GTX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.
WCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, WESCO International, Inc. reported a net income of 209.00M and revenue of 6.67B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
GTX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WCC and GTX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCC has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to GTX (13.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCC dropped -86.28% vs GTX's -93.91%.
GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCC and GTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer