GTX vs. EMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX).

Performance

GTX vs. EMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GTX vs. EMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	4.66%	97.23%	-6.62%	26.90%	-5.11%	81.26%	-55.66%	-19.04%	-35.66%
EMX EMX Royalty Corporation	0.00%	140.46%	6.79%	-14.29%	-16.74%	-32.24%	104.07%	45.27%	0.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GTX : $3.59B EMX : $454.57M
EPS GTX : $1.54 EMX : $0.04
PE Ratio GTX : 11.82 EMX : 94.44
PEG Ratio GTX : 0.09 EMX : 21.38
PS Ratio GTX : 1.02 EMX : 17.07
Total Revenue (TTM) GTX : $3.58B EMX : $26.63M
Gross Profit (TTM) GTX : $850.00M EMX : $10.56M
EBITDA (TTM) GTX : $429.00M EMX : $18.42M

Returns By Period

GTX

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.40%
• YTD: 4.66%
• 6M: 34.58%
• 1Y: 121.27%
• 3Y*: 34.50%
• 5Y*: 28.69%
• 10Y*: —

EMX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GTX vs. EMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTX

GTX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTX vs. EMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and EMX Royalty Corporation (EMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTX	EMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.36	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTX	EMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between GTX and EMX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GTX vs. EMX - Dividend Comparison

GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while EMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
GTX Garrett Motion Inc.	1.54%	1.49%
EMX EMX Royalty Corporation	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GTX	EMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.16%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.11%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTX	EMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.95%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.79%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.75%	—	—

Financials

GTX vs. EMX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Garrett Motion Inc. and EMX Royalty Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a gross profit of 185.00M and revenue of 891.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

EMX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMX Royalty Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.53M and revenue of 5.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

GTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported an operating income of -405.00M and revenue of 891.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -45.5%.

EMX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMX Royalty Corporation reported an operating income of 975.00K and revenue of 5.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.

GTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a net income of 84.00M and revenue of 891.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

EMX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMX Royalty Corporation reported a net income of 642.00K and revenue of 5.77M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.