GTX vs. ESLT
GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) and ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd.) are both stocks. GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while ESLT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, GTX returned 37.74%/yr vs 44.82%/yr for ESLT. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GTX vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTX achieves a 79.86% return, which is significantly higher than ESLT's 40.31% return.
GTX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 73.78%
- YTD
- 79.86%
- 1Y
- 145.52%
- 3Y*
- 59.53%
- 5Y*
- 37.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.89%
ESLT
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- YTD
- 40.31%
- 1Y
- 74.80%
- 3Y*
- 56.84%
- 5Y*
- 44.82%
- 10Y*
- 24.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $61.06M | $60.15M | $83.63M | |
| $74.68M | $73.43M | $92.59M |
GTX vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 79.86% | 97.23% | -6.62% | 26.90% | -5.11% | 81.26% | -55.66% | -19.04% | -43.91% |
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd. | 40.31% | 125.14% | 22.17% | 31.30% | -4.82% | 34.77% | -14.56% | 37.62% | -11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTX and ESLT is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2018 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
GTX:
$5.81B
ESLT:
$37.89B
GTX:
$1.82
ESLT:
$12.29
GTX:
17.09
ESLT:
65.80
GTX:
0.14
ESLT:
3.11
GTX:
1.63
ESLT:
4.70
GTX:
$3.75B
ESLT:
$8.23B
GTX:
$881.00M
ESLT:
$2.03B
GTX:
$482.00M
ESLT:
$861.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTX vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank
GTX
ESLT
GTX vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTX | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.30 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.98 | 2.55 | +4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.97 | 5.89 | +14.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTX vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTX drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTX and ESLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTX | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.91% | -53.79% | -40.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.56% | -29.27% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -29.27% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -32.89% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.02% | -20.09% | +6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.52% | -13.96% | -41.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.19% | 12.64% | -5.45% |
Volatility
GTX vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison
Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) at 11.92%. This indicates that GTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTX | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.44% | 11.92% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.03% | 36.97% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.35% | 45.12% | +4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.63% | 34.07% | +7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.83% | 29.70% | +34.13% |
Dividends
GTX vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison
GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than ESLT's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd. | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.63% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.96% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GTX vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garrett Motion Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GTX vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison
GTX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 976.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.
ESLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd. reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.
GTX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.
ESLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd. reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
GTX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
ESLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd. reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTX and ESLT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTX has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to ESLT (11.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTX dropped -93.91% vs ESLT's -53.79%.
GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTX and ESLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer