GTX vs. ESLT
GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) and ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) are both stocks. GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while ESLT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, GTX returned 33.65%/yr vs 43.14%/yr for ESLT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GTX vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTX achieves a 94.87% return, which is significantly higher than ESLT's 34.03% return.
GTX
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 94.87%
- 6M
- 94.98%
- 1Y
- 252.77%
- 3Y*
- 67.69%
- 5Y*
- 33.65%
- 10Y*
- —
ESLT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 34.03%
- 6M
- 33.47%
- 1Y
- 76.89%
- 3Y*
- 55.37%
- 5Y*
- 43.14%
- 10Y*
- 25.45%
GTX vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 94.87% | 97.23% | -6.62% | 26.90% | -5.11% | 81.26% | -55.66% | -19.04% | -43.91% |
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 34.03% | 125.14% | 22.17% | 31.30% | -4.82% | 34.77% | -14.56% | 37.62% | -11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTX and ESLT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2018 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
GTX:
$6.52B
ESLT:
$37.17B
GTX:
$1.72
ESLT:
$12.36
GTX:
19.63
ESLT:
62.48
GTX:
0.16
ESLT:
2.96
GTX:
2.49
ESLT:
4.46
GTX:
$2.71B
ESLT:
$8.23B
GTX:
$855.00M
ESLT:
$2.03B
GTX:
$452.00M
ESLT:
$861.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTX vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank
GTX
ESLT
GTX vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTX | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.86 | 1.31 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.81 | 2.98 | +9.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.66 | 7.81 | +33.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTX vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTX drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTX and ESLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTX | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.91% | -53.79% | -40.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.87% | -25.98% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -25.98% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.66% | -32.89% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -23.67% | +21.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.15% | -13.92% | -42.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 9.88% | -3.78% |
Volatility
GTX vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) is 9.94%, while Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a volatility of 20.62%. This indicates that GTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTX | ESLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.94% | 20.62% | -10.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 36.46% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.04% | 44.13% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.55% | 33.73% | +7.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.00% | 29.46% | +34.54% |
Dividends
GTX vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison
GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than ESLT's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.63% |
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.89% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GTX vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garrett Motion Inc. and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GTX and ESLT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESLT has higher volatility (20.62%) compared to GTX (9.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTX dropped -93.91% vs ESLT's -53.79%.
GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.31 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTX and ESLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer